logga
Image: Lars Eliasson
Disc chippers are best suited for chipping stem wood, while drum chippers offer greater versatility. Hammermills can handle all types of materials, but have high fuel consumption.

In 2017, 22% of the woody biomass harvested in EU28 was used for energy production, and low-value forest biomass is seen as a key resource in mitigating climate change. The use of logging residues and small trees from thinning is still far from its maximum sustainable potential due to low supply chain profitability. The cost structure for the biomass supply of these assortments is dominated by costs of comminution and road transports, which are dependent on each other, and operational analyses to find efficient supply systems are of the utmost importance. A prerequisite for these analyses is reliable data on the performance of comminution equipment (chippers and grinders) and the trucks used.

Our aim was to provide functions for estimating productivity, fuel consumption and energy efficiency for comminution equipment, based on equipment type, feedstock and the type of chips produced.

The results show general differences between the machine types, given the same engine size. Disc chippers are more productive and more fuel and energy efficient compared to drum chippers and hammermills when chipping stemwood, but lose efficiency and produce low-quality chips when chipping logging residues or small trees. Drum chippers are more versatile and produce acceptable chips from all uncontaminated feedstocks, but fuel consumption is slightly higher. Hammermills can handle all feedstocks, including stumps, but fuel consumption is high. A comparison of drum chippers and hammermills indicates a difference in the effect of engine power on the two machine types, which is logical. 

No. 74-2024    Published 10/18/2024 8:50 AM

Comments
No comments exists on the page
Comment
Send
Comments will be reviewed before publishing
Thank you for your comment!
We will review and publish your comment as soon as possible.
Unfortunately were we unable to save your comment. You have not confirmed that you are not a robot
Authors
Lars Eliasson
Senior researcher
Raffaele Spinelli
Henrik Von Hofsten
Previously employed